<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Augmented Reality added value</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ydreams.com/blog/2009/10/12/augmented-reality-added-value/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ydreams.com/blog/2009/10/12/augmented-reality-added-value/</link>
	<description>The official company blog about technology, projects, corporate life and all things YDreams</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 09:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blake Callens</title>
		<link>http://www.ydreams.com/blog/2009/10/12/augmented-reality-added-value/comment-page-1/#comment-1800</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake Callens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 20:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ydreams.com/blog/?p=561#comment-1800</guid>
		<description>Good post.  I think that the main problem with the public face of AR right now is that most developers are looking at it as a way to make a quick buck or get funding for a startup.  Not many folks are looking at it in terms of the long haul, and hence, aren't focusing on actual usefulness of applications.

I wouldn't be surprised if we even see a new term for useful AR come out of this mounting backlash.

twitter.com/blakecallens</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post.  I think that the main problem with the public face of AR right now is that most developers are looking at it as a way to make a quick buck or get funding for a startup.  Not many folks are looking at it in terms of the long haul, and hence, aren&#8217;t focusing on actual usefulness of applications.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if we even see a new term for useful AR come out of this mounting backlash.</p>
<p>twitter.com/blakecallens</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Linkfest &#171; Games Alfresco</title>
		<link>http://www.ydreams.com/blog/2009/10/12/augmented-reality-added-value/comment-page-1/#comment-1766</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly Linkfest &#171; Games Alfresco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 14:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ydreams.com/blog/?p=561#comment-1766</guid>
		<description>[...] YDreams&#8217; blog &#8211; what&#8217;s augmented reality added value? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] YDreams&#8217; blog &#8211; what&#8217;s augmented reality added value? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artur</title>
		<link>http://www.ydreams.com/blog/2009/10/12/augmented-reality-added-value/comment-page-1/#comment-1763</link>
		<dc:creator>Artur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 07:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ydreams.com/blog/?p=561#comment-1763</guid>
		<description>No doubt that at the moment AR is pratically just shiny toys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt that at the moment AR is pratically just shiny toys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lila</title>
		<link>http://www.ydreams.com/blog/2009/10/12/augmented-reality-added-value/comment-page-1/#comment-1759</link>
		<dc:creator>Lila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ydreams.com/blog/?p=561#comment-1759</guid>
		<description>Loving your AR video, we need to hire more guys like you ;) lol!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loving your AR video, we need to hire more guys like you <img src='http://www.ydreams.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> lol!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

